Minutes for TexShare Texas Collections Working Group Conference
Oct. 18, 2006

Beverley Shirley explained some background information on
the grant rule process. The agency is consolidating all the
grants under one subchapter of the rules. Each TSLAC grant
program will have a separate section for their specific rules,
but the general rules will apply to all grants. Some of the
details will not be put in the rules, but will be addressed
in the guidelines for each grant program.

The task of the working group was to look at the existing
TexTreasures rules and recommend changes. The changes considered

  1. Do we still see the purpose of TexTreasures grants as
    “seed” money, or do we want to allow the grants
    to fully fund discrete projects? As more libraries have
    acquired the hardware and software to accomplish their digitization
    and access goals, do we have less need for “seed money”
    to get projects started? Would we benefit more by providing
    funds to allow for more materials within the collections
    to be digitized or made accessible in other ways?
    The recommendation of the group was to drop the seed
    money and allow funding to discrete projects. The issue
    of allowing applicants to apply for additional funding for
    the same project for up to 3 years of funding was also discussed,
    but we didn’t come to a final recommendation.
  2. Microfilming is now in use as a preservation technology,
    not as a strategy for increased access to collections. Would
    it, therefore, be appropriate to remove “microfilming”
    from the list of eligible project activities (which we will
    move to the guidelines)?

    The group agreed that microfilming was principally a
    preservation technology, and that these grants are not specifically
    for preservation activities but is meant for access and
    resource sharing projects. The group recommends that “microfilming”
    be removed from the list of eligible project activities.

  3. TexShare member libraries have forged a number of valuable
    partnerships enabling their joint digital projects (e.g.
    Museum of Houston, Texas Digital Library, EPals, Regional
    Library Systems, etc.). Should we allow non-profit organizations
    applying on behalf of TexShare members to be eligible? Should
    we allow TexTreasures funding to be applied to non-member
    partners in the project as well as to TexShare member collections?

    After a lengthy discussion, the group agreed that the
    applicant should be a TexShare member, and the funds should
    be awarded to the applicant. TexShare members can apply
    on behalf of a partnership that includes non-members, and
    the funds can be directed to non-profit organizations in
    the partnership.

    4. Other competitive grants offered by TSLAC do specify
    a match in the grants’ rules; rather match is specified
    in the grant guidelines and does not come into play for
    amounts at the $20,000 - $25,000 level. Should we remove
    the match requirement from TexTreasures grants? If so, should
    we ask applicants to address sustainable access to their
    collections in the project design portion?

    The recommendation of the group is to remove the match requirement
    from the grant rules, but award points in the scoring for
    cost effectiveness to encourage leveraging local resources.
    The group proposes adding a question to the rules under
    Award Criteria, Cost Effectiveness – “Does the
    project proposal leverage local resources?”

    5. Other competitive grants offered by TSLAC do not specify
    a cap on the amount of the grant. Should we continue to
    cap grants to individual applicants at $20,000? Would it
    be appropriate to have a larger cap for collaborative projects
    - $25,000?

    The group recommends keeping the cap at $20,000 for
    a single applicant and raising the cap to $25,000 for collaborative
    projects. This should be taken out of the rules and put
    in the guidelines to be consistent with the other TSLAC

    6. The commission will also be considering a proposal that
    for FY2008 and FY2009 portions of each competitive grant
    be reserved for regional library system applications, should
    systems choose to apply. We ask the TexShare Advisory Board
    to make recommendations to the commission regarding this
    proposal as it relates to TexTreasures grants.

    There was concern expressed by the working group that
    the grant funds available are too small to reserve a portion
    of it for the Systems. The working group would be scoring
    all applications, while only giving out 2 or 3 grants each
    year based on those scores. The time and energy necessary
    to go through the process of awarding the grants would be
    disproportional to the small number of grants awarded on
    the basis of that scoring process.

Submitted by Ellen Safly
Chair, TexTreasures Working Group

Page last modified: July 29, 2011
Top of Page